Laserfiche WebLink
Addendum 5 - 20210205 <br />42. Since no geotechnical information is available in any of the pond locations and what information that is <br />provided within proximity of the ponds, only covers a portion of the material to excavate, can the <br />contractors have access to the pond sites to dig "test holes"? <br />Yes, the County will provide access to perform test pits upon written request. <br />43. Addendum 003. "Clearing for the utility relocations (FPL posts) will be a first task on the Contractor's <br />Schedule". Will FPL remove their poles or will it be the Contractor's responsibility to remove/dispose of <br />the poles. <br />FPL is relocating their poles and is responsible for removing the old poles. <br />44. The governing standards on the front cover sheet of the plans are stated to be the 2015 FDOT Standard <br />Specifications. On sheet T-4 of the 1B Signalization Plans, note D1 states "MAST ARMS SHALL FOLLOW THE <br />LATEST STATE OF FLORIDA MAST ARMS SHALL FOLLOW THE LATEST STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF <br />TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS INDEX No. 17743, 17745." Are we to use the latest which would be the 20- <br />21 Specifications or the 2015 Specifications? The 2015 specifications do not meet the current wind loading <br />requirements. <br />The signalization improvement design was performed under the FDOT 2016 specifications. The <br />referenced note is from the County signalization general notes. <br />45. It was stated in addendum 3 and at the pre-bid that there are no dwellings to be removed, but there has <br />not been an addendum that removes Pay Item 0110 3 Removal of Existing Structure (Dwelling). Will there <br />be a revised Bid Schedule to remove this pay item? <br />The Pay Item Number 0110 3 has been deleted. The itemized bid schedule has been revised accordingly. <br />46. Please provide pay item that correspond to bridge demolition for existing bridge at 69th St. Sta. 201+22. <br />The cost of removing the existing bridge at 69th Street shall be included within pay item 110-1-1. <br />47. Please confirm if the construction of the wing walls (plan sheet 76-77) for the reinforced concrete box <br />culvert 12' x 10' is incidental to pay item 400-4-1 (Phase 113) <br />The wingwall construction associated with the RCBC is to be included within pay item 400-2-2 Class II <br />Concrete (Endwall). The cost of reinforcing steel within the RCBC wingwalls are incidental to this pay <br />item. <br />48. Please confirm pay item 530-3-3 Rock Rubble in Bridges at 53rd St, and North Relief Canal includes: filter <br />fabric, 1' thickness of bedding stone, 2.5' thickness of riprap ruble (bank & shore), and Keystone rock at the <br />toe of the slope? <br />That is correct. <br />49. Please confirm pay item 530-3-3 riprap, rubble as per plan sheet No. 19 (phase 1A) only includes filter <br />fabric, and 2.5 FT thickness of RipRap, rubble (bank & shore) around RCP pipes as indicated on plans. <br />All pipes entering IRFWCD facilities are to include rip rap bank protection. Plans are being amended and <br />quantity of rip rap has been increased to 1156 Tons. <br />50. Phase 16, plan sheet No. 12, footnote 530-3-4 states: "cost of rubble to include cost and placement of <br />MARAFI fabric, bedding stone, and keystone aggregate". However, details on plan sheet No. 78 doesn't <br />show bedding stone, please advise. <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />