10/16/2001 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Y777 3111111 91 1 rL 119 f :. J iG + . . ..'d' Q' rl x S'..K 66 may end up having to be re - designated as commercial should the node near him require expansion . More pressure points will come along . This is not a perfect solution nor was the Comprehensive Plan , but we have to work with what we have . She still felt that Mr . Clontz ' property has a problem . Chairman Ginn felt approval of this will only create additional "pressure points " further to the south . Vice Chairman Stanbridge disagreed because other properties are not next to commercial , but are buffered . If this were being done earlier, multi - family could have been put there . Chairman Ginn thought there will still be complaints about spraying and traffic impact . She felt people have purchased property relying on the Comprehensive Plan . Changes mean more changes and she could not support the change being discussed . She felt it would be opening Pandora ' s box . Commissioner Tippin wished he did not have to vote on this because he preferred things the way they were when there were 5 houses between 27 " and 43 `d on Rebel Road . . When working on the Comprehensive Plan , it was like giving breach birth to a porcupine . All the State officials said they were going to use it as a model , it was the best they had ever seen . Ten years later, the same bureaucracy called it "urban sprawl " . He supports the change, but not the motion on the floor . Commissioner Adams thought if the motion fails , perhaps a trigger percentage could be implemented . When asked how that might be implemented, Director Keating directed their attention to page 307 , Attachment A (to the ordinance) , verbiage could be added to the last sentence as follows : . . . " and if the adjacent commercial/industrial node is developed at least 70 % or more . . . " . October 16 , 2001 106 x Szr h e f z r