My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/2001 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
10/16/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2022 5:04:34 PM
Creation date
4/4/2022 4:41:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/16/2001
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
re <br />S <br />MR <br />space early in the process . <br />Chairman Ginn was concerned how this occurred and thought that a compromiseYY3F4 <br />could be reached . <br />Public Works Director James Davis explained how the problem occurred from the <br />Y {s engineering perspective and believed there could have been some misunderstanding . He <br />agreed the gate is narrow , not in a good location , and does not have a good opening <br />Y mechanism . He advised that a staff member, a CAD technician , had done some of the <br />drafting for this project on his own time but that a fire hydrant was not shown on the original <br />Fdrawing . He added that there was no impropriety on the part of the employee . This <br />entranceway is uniquely situated and it is a problem , but it is not uncommon for garbage <br />trucks to back into driveways to turn around .He hoped it could be worked out . <br />Fire Prevention Bureau Chief Dan Dietz , having sworn to tell the truth , stated that the <br />Fire Department had two issues with this subdivision : 1 ) an insufficient turning radius for t F <br />their trucks to make the immediate left-hand turn just inside the gate to serve that street , and <br />2 ) the opening of the exit gate blocks an existing fire hydrant . He has met with Riverpoint ' s <br />Board and given thein the turning radius specifications and the code requiring hydrants to <br />be unobstructed . He was given assurance that they would respond on this matter . It appears <br />that Mr . Keating ' s proposed plan would meet the required turning radius . A new fire <br />hydrant has been offered and an offer to relocate the one behind the gate which serves Vero <br />Shores and all the homes outside the gate . It appears that if those plans are implemented , <br />the two original problems with the gate would be solved . <br />Mr . Esposito believed his property has been depreciated because of this gate . <br />Commissioner Adams thought Mr . Esposito may have a legitimate reason to contact <br />PtheProperty AppraisereAraiser about the value of his property . She also suggested several possible <br />solutions and pointed out that Mr . Esposito ' s ultimate course might be a civil suit . <br />Discussion ensued . <br />It <br />fi <br />k <br />October 16 , 2001 <br />133 <br />E ) u U <br />T <br />r <br />t If'5, <br />1182 <br />RSV
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.