My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07_23_2008
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
07_23_2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 11:02:53 AM
Creation date
4/20/2022 10:58:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/23/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
City of Fellsmere
City of Sebastian
City of Vero Beach
Town of Indian River Shores
Town of Orchid
Subject
Interlocal Service Boundart Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On the issue of heights, Attorney Dill explained that the City of Fellsmere <br />generally has a 35 -foot height limit. There is a 1,000 -foot box around I-95 presently that <br />has a 65 -foot height limit, which is not automatic, and one has to go through a number of <br />hoops to get there and give a lot more to the City in the way of aesthetic features, <br />etcetera. He admitted that that may be increased to other areas within the city limits. He <br />revealed that Fellsmere had five (5) feet for architectural embellishment initially, and <br />during their public hearing process, a public speaker told them that the County allows 15 <br />feet for architectural embellishments; and not wanting to be different from the County, <br />they went with 15 feet. It is not something Fellsmere made up, he remarked. <br />Attorney Dill felt the only issues were with Exhibit "D" for Sebastian and <br />Exhibit "F" for Fellsmere. He stated that in Fellsmere they are really down to open <br />space, green belt, and agriculture. He noted a visible expression of willingness from the <br />City of Fellsmere to work with the County, and was sure the County was willing to bend <br />a little and work with Fellsmere. He perceived that if they quit looking backwards and <br />move forward, they could conclude this process with a successful document. <br />Attorney Dill concluded on the issue of voting rights. He acknowledged <br />that citizens would have to vote if there is a Charter, and they would have to vote on <br />many things in the Charter like height, densities and annexations. He advised that they <br />have the same provisions in the ISBA, except, it is not every resident in the city; it may <br />be more complicated than that because it is five cities in the County that would have to <br />agree, so there is a strong voting mechanism in the ISBA agreement, which he did not <br />think was mentioned. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan pointed out that Section "A" deals with height <br />and density changes for annexed property outside the Urban Service Area (USA), and <br />when property is annexed outside the USA, in effect, they are moving the Urban Service <br />28 <br />July 23, 2008 / Joint Workshop <br />ISBA, Sebastian <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.