Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 of 7 <br />construction material storage or activities. <br />• A question was asked if Builder's Risk Insurance, per the contract, is necessary. The <br />requirement for Builder's Risk Insurance will be addressed in the addendum. <br />• A question was asked about the application of Polyacrylamide on all disturbed areas but <br />it's not clear as to how long after earthwork activities the application should take place. <br />James Ennis stated the application should be part of the Contractor's SWPPP (Stormwater <br />Pollution Prevention Plan) best management practices for dust control and that <br />application rates/frequency should be based upon the Contractor's monitoring that should <br />take place so that dust doesn't become a pollutant. <br />• The adjacent project, IRC -1325: 58th Avenue Full Depth Reclamation, is already complete <br />and no project coordination is necessary. <br />• No insurance for the FEC (Florida East Coast) Railroad will be necessary as no work shall <br />take place within their right of way. <br />• Fuel and bitumen adjustment costs are excluded from County projects. <br />• The cross section sheets numbered 64-79 reflect a difference in design from the existing <br />crown section to the proposed cross slope section. A question was asked how correct <br />quantities would be accounted for and how they would be paid. Brian Good stated the <br />additional quantities were accounted for in both base rock items. He stated it can be <br />quantified during construction by the station limits in the plans, and that a pay item for <br />the additional tonnage of Coquina base material will be provided. <br />• It was stated that the cross section stations are every 100' and there is concern that in <br />between the stations there could be a design quantity deficiency. Brian Good stated any <br />deficiency would have to be addressed as it was found and James Ennis stated anything as <br />such would need to be identified prior to breaking the road surface. <br />• A Contractor stated there is concern as to how the maximum percentage of material <br />passing the No. 200 sieve was to be achieved. Brian Good stated the core samples tested <br />were well below the maximum allowed. It is not the intent for the Contractor to have to <br />make those changes if there were an area that exceeded the amount allowed and it would <br />have to be addressed at the time it occurs. He stated that situation may require a change <br />to the amount of base replacement. James Ennis stated if soil conditions unexpectedly <br />changed in a manner that was substantially different compared to what was expected in <br />the mix design then the mix design would have to be adjusted accordingly and that the, <br />the purpose of the contingency fund was to address these types of unexpected field <br />conditions. <br />• Brian Good stated that the quantities for sod were determined based on where soil <br />disturbance will take place, which is from the north right of way of 69th Street to either the <br />south right of way or the top of the bank of the Sub -Lateral Canals. <br />• It was stated that mowing does not have a separate line item. Mowing is included in the <br />Mobilization Pay Item No. 101-1. <br />• A question was asked about the proposed cross slope changes that will take place. Brian <br />Good confirmed the only places where this occurs is where this project will transition into <br />an existing condition, usually within a distance of 50'. <br />• The roadway pay item for Mail Box, furnish and install, was clarified that the intent is for <br />the old mail boxes to be removed and new mail boxes to be installed. However, coordination <br />with the property owner will be required to confirm they agree with the replacement. <br />F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1639 69th Street 66th Avenue to US -1 Resurfacing (SCOP)\1- <br />Admin\Meetings\PreBid\IRC-1639_PREBID_MIN_ 20220316.docx <br />