My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
11/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:13 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:14:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
an analysis of the proposed amendment's compatibility with the <br />surrounding area; and <br />an analysis of the proposed amendment's potential impact on <br />environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Draifiage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component, of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For land use amendment requests', conditional concurrency <br />review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since land use <br />amendment requests are not projects, county regulations call for <br />the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested land use designation. <br />For residential land use amendment requests, the most intense use <br />(according to the County's LDRs) is the maximum number of units <br />that could be built on the site, given the size of the property and <br />the maximum density under the proposed land use designation. The <br />site information used for the concurrency analysis is:as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: <br />118.4 acres <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: L= 2, Low -Density <br />Residential -2 (up to 6 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing Land <br />Use Designation: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed Land <br />Use Designation: <br />- Transportation <br />110 single-family units <br />147 single-family units <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the maximum number of units allowed on the subject <br />property under the proposed land use designation indicates that the <br />existing level of service "D" or better on impacted roadways would <br />not be lowered. The site information used for determining traffic <br />is as follows: <br />Existing Land Use Designation <br />1. Residential Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual: <br />Single -Family _ <br />BOOK 96 P�q.�F 6�0 <br />NOVEMBER 21, 1995 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.