My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/28/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
5/28/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
preliminary PD plan/plat requests. Therefore, all concurrency <br />requirements related to special exception use and preliminary <br />PD plan/plat approval have been satisfied. <br />13. Environmental Issues: Since the total site is over 5 acres, <br />the native upland set-aside requirements of section 929.05 <br />potentially could apply. However, based upon an inspection of <br />the site by the county's environmental planning staff, staff <br />has determined that no native upland habitat exist on the <br />site. Therefore, no native upland habitat preservation <br />requirements apply. <br />14. Waivers: The applicant is not requesting any waivers through <br />the PD process. Under the agricultural PD regulations, the <br />maximum "lot" (homesite) size is required to be reduced to an <br />area of 1 acre or less, which has been satisfied by this <br />application. <br />15. Buffers and Setbacks: Given that the surrounding area is <br />presently used for agricultural purposes, no special buffering <br />is required under the planned development LDRs. Since the A-1 <br />district minimum 30' setback exceeds the 25' perimeter PD <br />setback, the 30' A-1 district setback will control. The plan <br />proposes a minimum distance of 80' from any homesite building <br />envelope to any adjacent property with an active agricultural <br />operation. Such a separation distance exceeds the LDR 50' <br />separation distance applicable to such circumstances. <br />While LDR section 915.16 does not require a perimeter buffer, <br />a double frontage buffer could be required along the west <br />property line, based upon LDR sections 913.09(6)(c)5 and <br />913.09(3)(c)5, since the proposed subdivision road is on the <br />project perimeter. The applicant will either need to provide <br />a double frontage buffer -meeting the requirements of LDR <br />section 913.09(3)(c)5 or dedicate the roadway in a manner that <br />will provide legal access to the property to the west. Such <br />access may be used if the property to the west is developed. <br />The proposal accommodates room for the double frontage buffer. <br />Prior to issuance of an LDP permit or permit waiver, the <br />applicant will need to either design a double frontage buffer <br />or commit to final plat language allowing the adjacent <br />property owner to use the proposed subdivision road for future <br />development. <br />16. Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plant: While the county does not <br />address this issue in its LDRs, there has been a county policy <br />of discouraging the planting of host plants in agricultural <br />areas. The applicants have indicated that they would have no <br />objection to creating a restriction that would prohibit host <br />plants on the subject property. Staff will continue to <br />recommend inclusion of such a restriction when the project <br />covenants and restrictions are reviewed at the time of final <br />plat application. <br />17. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: <br />North: Groves, Single Family/A-1 <br />South: Groves/A-1 <br />East: Groves/A-1 <br />West: Groves/A-1 <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br />9.1 <br />BOOK PALE 1i <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.