Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 98 PA1,c 204 <br />we received a letter this morning from the School Board saying that <br />they would like to be reimbursed for their overhead cost in the <br />amount of $1,672. The committee recommended that we don't pay the <br />cost because it is felt that would take from the dollars that could <br />go -directly into the program. Director Baird advised that we have <br />a backup plan if the School Board does not go into the program. <br />The Substance Abuse Council would do a drug prevention program as <br />a replacement. <br />Commissioner"Eggert pointed out that this falls back on what <br />the County's auditor has said about not paying for indirect costs. <br />She cautioned against setting a precedent by approving payment of <br />this indirect cost. <br />Diane Bernardo, Melinda Gielow, and Linda Thompson of the <br />School District, spoke about the School Board's policy that unless <br />the School Board was reimbursed for indirect costs (administrative <br />costs), they would not take the grant. <br />Collette Heid of the Substance Abuse Council spoke on the <br />replacement program for drug prevention. <br />Commissioners Bird and Tippin expressed concern about <br />jeopardizing the program. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />to approve the grant funding as submitted with the <br />condition that if the School Board doesn't accept, <br />the County will go to the backup plan as outlined <br />by Director Baird, passed by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners <br />Bird and Tippin dissenting). <br />Commissioner Bird felt that puts the ball back in the School <br />Board's court and we will see where it goes from there. <br />43RD AVENUE ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE EMPROVEMENTS <br />BETWEEN 26TH AND 8TH STREETS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - <br />CARTER ASSOCIATES <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/20/96: <br />33 <br />MAY 289 1996 <br />� � r <br />