My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/28/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
5/28/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:49 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />Boa 98 rt,[ 237 <br />DISCUSSION <br />School Board Member Mayfield commented on Commissioner Bird's <br />estimates of value ($1.75 million = value of the old courthouse, <br />annex and State's Attorney building) versus the School Board's <br />estimates of value ($4 million = value of lease over the remaining <br />period) which leaves a $2.25 million difference. <br />Chairman Adams countered that Mr. Mayfield was basing the <br />lease value on future worth and Commissioner Bird's estimate was <br />current value. She believed that, in about 4 years, the values <br />would be equal. <br />Mr. Mayfield understood her point, but responded that it would <br />also cost the School Board an additional $3.2 million to build. <br />Chairman Adams understood. She also could feel their <br />resistance to the buildings and suggested they "cut to the chase". <br />Mr. Mayfield agreed, but contended that he would like to see <br />the deal worked out for the sake of the community, and his desire <br />to see the old courthouse revitalized. <br />Chairman Adams emphasized that she also wanted to see it <br />worked out if that was what the School Board really wanted to do. <br />She did not want the County to be at a disadvantage; the County had <br />other alternatives and was letting the School Board have the first <br />opportunity. She felt enough discussion has gone before and, at <br />this point, she was anxious to learn if the School Board did or did <br />not want the deal that was offered. <br />At the urging of Mr. Mayfield, Dr. Dearing explained the <br />School Board's counter-offer which involved the "race track" money <br />or the value of it. He emphasized there was more cost attached to <br />renovating the buildings than replicating the space they presently <br />occupy. He pointed out the anticipated growth of the School <br />District, the shortage of classrooms, the lack of funds for <br />administrative space, and current millage rate. He suggested that, <br />if the County really wanted/needed the School Administration <br />Building, they go back to the original lease and reconsider the <br />"race track" funds. They could not build with only half of the <br />"race track" funds, but they do have a lease worth $4 million to <br />them. <br />School Board Member Lindsey advised that they could live with <br />what they have now and hope -their finances will improve during the <br />remaining years of the lease. He recounted a conversation with Dr. <br />Dearing about finances where he said if the County could not come <br />up with a better offer, things would have to remain the same, <br />because he had no idea where they could come up with $5 million. <br />He suggested that either the County or the School Board would have <br />14 <br />May 30, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.