Laserfiche WebLink
40 <br />D <br />k._ ;, <br />compiled the information obtained from the questionnaire which had been validated during the <br />interviews. <br />The completed questionnaires were reviewed by SCP personnel and incorporated in the 1998 <br />program document called the Staff and Space Summary. <br />Programming Methodology <br />Staff net space requirements were derived from the growth projections and existing standards <br />utilized by Indian River County and many other counties of similar size throughout the state of <br />Florida. Support spaces were tested in diagrammatic form to establish the area (net square foot) <br />requirements for these spaces. <br />Other key areas such as the conference center and food service (breakroom) were developed in <br />diagrammatic form allowing for equipment, staff and circulation requirements. <br />Common amenities were developed by a process similar to that used for other key areas, utilizing <br />diagrams presented to and reviewed by the County. The diagram which best represented the <br />program requirements established the net square foot allocation in the program. <br />Building support spaces were sized by establishing criteria for population count and mix for <br />restroom facilities, capacity, size and level of redundancy for machinery and equipment spaces <br />and by applying historical knowledge of other projects of similar size and complexity for <br />maintenance areas. <br />Circulation, the net to usable (circulation) area factor was derived by applying historical <br />knowledge of other projects of similar size and complexity. This factor was adjusted or deleted <br />where internal circulation was already accounted for in the diagram for certain spaces. The <br />factor used was 1.35 x net SF. <br />Usable to gross area factor was derived by applying historical knowledge of other projects of <br />similar size and complexity. This factor was reasonably constant throughout the program spaces. <br />The factor used was 1.2 x department net equals GSF. This factor results in a building that is <br />approximately 83.3% efficient versus the existing building which is approximately 69.9% <br />efficient. <br />Conclusions <br />Staff Projections (both buildings): <br />As of calendar year 1998, the county staff count is 280; 264 will be housed in the <br />administrative building while 16 will be located in the purchasing building. <br />zi As of calendar year 2001, move -in, the county staff count is projected to be 339; 319 will be <br />housed in this administrative building while 20 will be located in the purchasing building. <br />zi As of calendar year 2010, the county staff count is projected to be 401; 378 will be housed in <br />the administrative building while 23 will be located in the purchasing building. <br />Executive Summary Page 1-3 <br />