Laserfiche WebLink
Insurance Valuations and Loss Preparedness <br />An insurance appraisal fulfills three needs: these are independence, placement value data, and <br />proof of loss preparedness. Differing levels and types of insurance appraisals fulfill each of these <br />needs to differing degrees. Addressing each need in turn below: <br />Independence: the insurance company would like to see an appraisal from act outside firm. This <br />is somewhat obvious so that there is not fraud perpetrated by the assured. Yes some insurance <br />companies now have their own appraisers but nasty loss situations may still occur. <br />Placement: an independent valuation will inform the assured about the amount of insurance to <br />carry. Such an analysis may be completed in great detail with say a+/ -10%o possible variance or <br />in an overview manner with a +/-20% or greater variance. Be wary, just because the insurance <br />carrier does an insurance placement value analysis, as stated before a very nasty loss situation may <br />occur, with the insurance company denying the proper amount of insurance is carried. <br />Proof of Loss: along with having the appropriate amount of insurance, this is the most important <br />element of an insurance appraisal. Directly stated, if one is not prepared to prove one's loss <br />instantly 10% of a fair settlement is gone. If not prepared this lost amount. may he 25%. The <br />strategy is to get a balanced "fair/ equitable and timely" settlement. These thoughts are directly <br />linked. Yes one can get a fair settlement say 5 years hence, but it is not timely. Or one can get a <br />quick timely settlement if one accepts 75 cents on the dollar. Again, not good. One wants the fair <br />settlement at full value in say 6-12 .months or whatever time is appropriate for the loss situation, <br />balancing.the wishes of"fair" and "timely" is the critical concept. <br />So let's address what is adequate Proof of Loss. <br />The fixed asset accounting record most often is ,grossly inadequate for a loss situation. Without <br />going into a long explanation, many fixed asset accounting systems contain data that includes <br />intangibles in the values, non -value entries, allocated values from acquisitions, "ghost" assets, <br />transfers in at'net book, values net of trade-ins, % value upgrades, and on ant- on. Flow diagrams <br />help to prove ones loss. Photographs and movies / videos of specific assets and systems help. <br />Files that have original purchase costs and descriptive detail are wonderful (but rarely are <br />available). Engineering records may help. Sorry, but in the instance of most facilities /.operations <br />the assured is not prepared. Oversight in this regard is strongly suggested: Why. do I say that? <br />Because I worked for the pre-eminent "insurance lossmachineryexpert" firms (my family three <br />generations).. No we were not "mean!', yes helping assureds as professionally / sensitively <br />possible, but ultimately to reasonablyprove one's loss is the assured's reiRonsibilfty. Repeating. <br />it is the assured's reaRonsibilijy to prove the loss, that is. the. essets that ate / were in place: and "in. <br />use" and the values of the assets. <br />Yes, for those facilities where the appraiser has had the opportunity to prepare a detailed valuation <br />for fair value accounting the information may be very good, at that instant. This mumes that <br />-112- <br />