My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-248
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2020's
>
2024
>
2024-248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2024 2:16:51 PM
Creation date
10/21/2024 2:11:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
09/24/2024
Control Number
2024-248
Agenda Item Number
12.J.1.
Entity Name
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Subject
Consulting Engineering Services Agreement for Integrated Waster Master Plan; IRCDUS 00.23.547
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.3 System Modeling / Linear Asset Capacity Assessment <br />3.3.1 Model Coordination Workshop (4 hours, in-person) <br />CONSULTANT will facilitate a four-hour in-person coordination meeting with the <br />COUNTY's existing hydraulic modeling consultant in order to discuss existing model <br />infrastructure, data sources, calibration efforts and workflows, data and calibration <br />needs, and other topics prior to model review and calibration. <br />3.3.2 Model Review and Existing Conditions Updates <br />CONSULTANT will update COUNTY's most current hydraulic models (three total; one <br />for distribution system, one for wastewater collection system, and one for reuse system) <br />to assess current and future system performance. <br />CONSULTANT will leverage COUNTY's current Geographic Information Systems (GIS) <br />attributes for updating the existing conditions hydraulic models. CONSULTANT will run <br />the existing conditions models with average flow and pressure conditions to check the <br />reasonableness of the resulting modeled system pressures for distribution, collection, <br />and reuse systems. Scope assumes that GIS is up-to-date and no updates to GIS are <br />included. <br />3.3.3 Existing Conditions Model Validation <br />CONSULTANT will work with the COUNTY to identify two conditions at which to run <br />each of the three models. For the collection system model, these will be a typical dry <br />weather condition and a wet weather condition. For the potable and reuse distribution <br />system models, these conditions will represent a period of baseline demand and a <br />period of high demand. CONSULTANT will utilize readily available data from <br />representative periods for each system to run initial model scenarios for the COUNTY's <br />three hydraulic models. This includes comparing results from the from the three <br />hydraulic models to actual and typical system performance criteria including minimum <br />and maximum pressure, velocity, fire flow (for potable water system), and headloss. <br />Models will be considered valid if 90% of the model results are within 10% of actual flow <br />data, within 10% of actual or expected pressure/level data, or within 5 feet of actual or <br />expected water column as applicable and aligned with actual SSOs (for collection). <br />CONSULTANT will present the six model outcomes to the COUNTY and discuss the <br />path forward for each model to perform boundary level calibration with additional <br />available data as part of Task 3.3.3 below, or to perform field data collection and full <br />calibration as part of Task 3.3.4 below. <br />3.3.4 Boundary Level Calibration <br />CONSULTANT will calibrate models as needed to known boundary level field conditions <br />(i.e. known system pressures, pump station discharge pressures, pressure zone HGLs, <br />measured flows). The boundary level calibration will be considered complete when 90% <br />of the model results are within 10% for the flow data and 5 feet of water column of the <br />field data. All exceptions will be justified and documented. Time series data validation <br />will be considered compared when the model is able to replicate the observed trends <br />and minimum and maximum points. Individual time points in time series will not be <br />compared. CONSULTANT will meet with COUNTY operations staff to review model <br />results and prepare for field calibration efforts if further model calibration is warranted. <br />3.3.5 Field Data Collection for Full Calibration <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.