Laserfiche WebLink
Notes: Please refer to item 6 in the staff report, which indicates <br />that 8.61 acres of private open space will be provided. Each lot <br />will need to maintain a minimum of 30% open space to provide the <br />8.61 acres of private open space that is part of the project's <br />overall open space area of 17.33 acres. <br />Based on the proposed design, staff supports the proposed waivers. <br />According to the applicant, the waivers provide the design <br />flexibilities for better organization of the improvements and the <br />ability to provide recreational amenities. <br />17. Landscaping and Buffering: There is no buffering required on <br />the north, east, and west perimeters, since along those <br />perimeters the development will meet the 150' transitional <br />area required in PD ordinance section 915.16 by providing <br />standard RS -3 lot sizes with standard RS -3 setbacks. A Type <br />"C" buffer with a berm and landscape feature is proposed and <br />will satisfy the double frontage buffer and PD south perimeter <br />buffer requirements. The Type "C" buffer with 6' opaque <br />feature will need to be reviewed and approved by staff via the <br />land development permit process. <br />18. Planning and Zoning Commission Concerns: The Planning and <br />Zoning Commission had two general concerns related to this <br />planned development. The first concern was the proposed PD <br />waivers' extent of departure from the RS -3 zoning lot size, <br />dimension, and setback requirements. The Commission expressed <br />reservations as to how much the RS -3 zoning criteria should be <br />reduced. Relating to the amount of reduction, staff explained <br />that, in order to provide maximum design flexibility, there is <br />no set "bottom line" reduction specified in the PD <br />regulations. In addition, staff has worked with the applicant <br />to ensure that all significant waivers are applied to internal <br />lots, and that perimeter lots generally meet the requirements <br />of the adjacent districts. Such waivers do not increase the <br />project's intensity since density and open space standards <br />cannot be waived for this project. Staff has explored setting <br />minimum design criteria in the past with design professionals. <br />Setting lot dimension and setback minimums, in addition to the <br />existing PD buffer and transition area requirements, would <br />reduce design and product flexibility. Use of significant <br />design flexibility can be seen in some of the Windsor <br />development, where the developer has obtained approval to <br />reduce the 12,000 square foot RS -3 minimum lot size to 1,000 <br />square feet for lots interior to the project. <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission's second concern related to <br />the overall appropriateness of this type of development given <br />the "rural" nature of the surrounding area. While residential <br />development in the past has been characterized by 1/2 acre <br />lots based on the Health Department requirements for well and <br />septic tanks, the comprehensive plan and LDRs encourage higher <br />density where water and sewer are available as would be the <br />case with this development. It is staff's opinion that a <br />density of 3 units/acre is appropriate for a site served by <br />water and sewer and within one mile of a regional mall. <br />Based on the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial, the <br />applicant has prepared graphics which he believes demonstrate <br />the advantages to the proposed style of development. These <br />graphics include the proposed subdivision design with the <br />footprint of structures and an alternate, standard (non -PD) <br />single family design with houses (see attachments 5 and 7, <br />respectively). Also, the applicant has prepared a density <br />distribution graphic that depicts how density is distributed <br />along the perimeter of the project versus the interior of the <br />project. The applicant has also chosen to revise the proposed <br />PD plan to remove the wall feature along 33rd Street as part <br />of the buffer in favor of a buffer comprised of a berm and <br />landscape material (see attachment #8). <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of <br />County Commissioners grant preliminary PD plan approval and approve <br />the conceptual PD plan and special exception request with the <br />following conditions: - <br />DECEMBER 17, 1996 98 <br />