12/17/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. M That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the developer shall obtain from the environmental planning section approval of a final littoral zone planting plan. 2. That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, all county and jurisdictional agency permits necessary to fill the project site's wetlands must be obtained and submitted to planning staff. 3. That, prior to the issuance of a land development permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from planning staff of a final landscape plan for the Type "C" buffer along the project site's 33rd Street frontage. 4. That, prior to the issuance of a land development -permit, the applicant shall obtain a mining permit exemption subject to the criteria of mining ordinance section 934.04(7)(b). 5. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for the project, the 5' sidewalk along 33rd Street and the Type "C" buffer along the south property line shall be constructed, and deemed acceptable by county staff. 6. That lot open space calculations certified by a Florida registered land surveyor as meeting the 30% open space requirement shall be submitted with each building permit application for each residence within the project. 7. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion, a right -turn lane shall be constructed at the project's entrance in a manner acceptable to the county traffic engineer.__ Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project and advised the Board that on the south side, the front and rear setbacks will be reduced from 25 to 20 feet on 33rd Street. He also noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended denial mainly due to the degree of departure in size on the interior lots, although staff feels the project is an acceptable one. Chairman Adams noted that the project is similar to Stonebridge and questioned the difference in the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. Director Boling responded that the Stonebridge project contains 2.2 -units per acres while this project contains 2.9 units per acres. Other differences include the fact that the interior lots are smaller for this project. However, the outside perimeter is completely standard except for the 33rd Street lots. The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Attorney Bruce Barkett, representing the applicant, pointed out that the adjacent property to the east is zoned RS -6 and these lots exceed the requirements of RS -6 zoning. The plan for the 990 feet fronting on 33rd Street has been modified from a wall to a 3 foot berm with a double hedge and understory and canopy trees. DECEMBER 17, 1996 99 '�