My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/18/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
3/18/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:03 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:55:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For these reasons, the proposed node reconfiguration represents a <br />logical and rational land use plan change that will facilitate <br />efficient land use within the county. <br />tTTW_.� - - - • <br />Besides node reconfiguration, the proposed amendment includes <br />extending the USA boundary approximately one-eighth of a mile west, <br />on the north side of SR 60. In terms of distance and area (29.5 <br />acres), this is a minor expansion that will not encourage urban <br />sprawl. <br />The USA expansion, however, is important to the county's efforts to <br />attract industry and increase employment. The proposed amendment <br />would result in the creation of the first tract in the county that <br />meets the minimum size; location and ownership requirements <br />necessary to develop an adequately sized, viable industrial park. <br />That site would consist of Subject Property 1 and the adjacent, <br />industrially designated 36.5 acre tract at the northwest corner of <br />SR 60 and 98th Avenue. For the industrial park to be developed, <br />however, centralized potable water and wastewater service must be <br />available to the entire 138.3 acre site. <br />For these reasons, the proposed USA expansion will implement the <br />county's economic development goals without encouraging urban <br />sprawl. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />Except for the west 29.5 acres of Subject Property 1, both sites <br />comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service <br />Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The <br />comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, <br />Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste; Drainage, and Recreation <br />(Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these <br />services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life <br />enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable <br />standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the <br />comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For <br />land use designation amendment requests,.this review is undertaken <br />as part of the conditional concurrency determination application <br />process. <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase land use intensity are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. For the subject request, the amount of land to be <br />removed from a C/I node exceeds the amount of land to be added to <br />another C/I node. Therefore, this land use amendment request is <br />exempt from concurrency review because the requested land use <br />designation changes would not increase the potential land use <br />intensity that the sites could accommodate. <br />Nevertheless, to ensure that the proposed amendment will not cause <br />the provision of public services to fall below adopted levels of <br />service, a concurrency review is included in this report. That <br />review will focus on Subject Property 1, the property "receiving" <br />the C/I designation and thereforer-potentially increasing its land <br />use intensity. <br />A concurrency review examines the available capacity of each <br />facility with respect to a proposed project. Since Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment requests are not projects, the concurrency review is <br />based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon <br />the requested land use designation. Typically, for commercial/. <br />industrial Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the most intense <br />use is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor <br />area per acre of land proposed for redesignation. <br />In this case, however, the intent of the request is to allow <br />development of an industrial park on Subject Property 1. That <br />intent is consistent with the county's Overall Economic Development <br />Plan and with the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development <br />Element. Proposed new future land use element policy 1.38 will <br />specifically limit development of Subject Property 1 to industrial <br />uses. <br />For that reason, the concurrency review for Subject Property 1 will <br />be based on industrial development of the entire 101.8 acre site. <br />The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as <br />follows: <br />MARCH 18, 1997 93 <br />BOOK 100 FACED <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.