4/22/1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. Maximum Lot/Homesite Area: Allowed: 1 acre Proposed: 1 acre 7. Open Space: Required: 60% Provided: 80% 8. Traffic Circulation: Access to 49th Street for all four- tracts ou=tracts will be via the subdivision's roadway, proposed as a single cul-de-sac in the center of the subdivision. The road will be constructed as a stabilized unpaved road within a 60' private road right-of-way. The LDRs allow such a road to be unpaved, since the subdivision is private, generates less than 100 daily trips, and is located outside the Urban Service Area. The traffic engineering division has reviewed and approved the roadway layout. 9. Stormwater Management: The public works department has reviewed and approved a conceptual stormwater plan. A detailed engineering stormwater plan will be reviewed and approved as part of the land development permit or permit waiver process. 10. Utilities: The project will have on-site well and septic tanks for each tract. These utility provisions have been approved by the Utility Services and Environmental Health Departments. 11. Dedications & Improvements: Although the existing 49th Street right-of-way is only 301, less than the 80' ultimate road right-of-way, no additional 49th Street right-of-way is required from the subject site due to the location of the Indian River Farms Water Control District canal right-of-way between the subject site and 49th Street. Since the proposed development is a low traffic generator/attractor and is outside of the Urban Service Area, the applicant is not required to provide sidewalks or bikeways. 12. Concurrency: The applicant has obtained a conditional concurrency certificate which satisfies concurrency requirements related to the special exception use and preliminary PD plan/plat requests. Therefore, all concurrency requirements related to special exception use and preliminary PD plan/plat approval have been satisfied. 13. Environmental Issues: Since the site is over 5 acres, the native _upland set-aside requirements of section 929.05 potentially could apply. However, based upon an inspection of the site by the county's environmental planning staff, staff has determined that no native upland habitat exist on the site. Therefore, no native upland habitat preservation requirements apply. 14. Waivers: The applicant is not requesting any waivers through the PD process. 15. Buffers and Setbacks: Given that the surrounding area is presently used for agricultural purposes, no special buffering is required under the planned development LDRs. Since the A-1 district minimum 30' setback exceeds the 25' perimeter PD setback, the 30' A-1 district setback will control. The plan proposes a minimum distance of 50' from any building envelope to any adjacent property with an active agricultural operation. Such a separation distance exceeds the LDR 50' separation distance applicable to such circumstances. 21 April 22, 1997 BOOK 101 FAGE 199