My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/13/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
5/13/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:08:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/13/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b,oOr 10 1 FACE 45 <br />On February 11, 1997, the Indian River County Boarcr of' County -Commissioners <br />approved contract negotiations with the firms of Camp -Dresser -and McKee, Inc. <br />(CDM) and Brown and Caldwell, Inc: (B&C) for the above -referenced project. <br />(See attached agenda items and minutes), The firm of CDM was selected to <br />provide engineering services, with B&C to provide financial analysis for <br />funding and payback of project costs. <br />The preliminary construction cost estimate is $2.2 million dollars. The <br />negotiated engineering fee with CDM is 5230,061.00. The negotiated fee for <br />the associated financial analysis is 519;387.00. For details of the proposed <br />contract, please see the attached. The Utilities staff is now before the <br />Board of County Commissioners for approval of the attached contracts to allow <br />the project to commence. Funding for this project will be through the Impact <br />Fee Fund. <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of <br />County Commissioners approve the attached contracts with CDM and B&C and <br />authorize Chairman to execute same as presented. <br />Commissioner Tippin found the cost to be staggering, and Capital Projects Engineer William F. <br />McCain explained that the project involved a lot more than just a conversion from a plant to a pumping <br />facility.. It is a very involved project. Upgrades are required with the high -pumping service system, <br />which will involve new control systems. These were all projects that were originally set up in the <br />master plan when it was going to remain a water plant to maintain future fire flow requirements for the <br />barrier island. Also additional ground storage was required, which entailed design and construction. <br />The old facility had to be decommissioned and specifications had to be drawn up for the bid package <br />and advertising. He advised that the building will remain but the interiors will be removed. <br />Commissioner Tippin felt that a plan should exist with which we could be comfortable. <br />Mr. McCain said that the tank would probably be prefabricated and that was one of the ways he <br />was able to get the price down to where it is. <br />Commissioner Adams felt she needed more information, and Commissioner Macht did also. <br />The suggestion was made to table the item for two weeks. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked why the engineering fees were higher than 10%, Mr. McCain <br />explained the guidelines and curves used. There is no Indian River County curve. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY Commissioner <br />Ginn, the Board unanimously tabled the matter for two weeks. <br />54 <br />MAY 13 1991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.