My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/17/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
3/17/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:43:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Tippin stated that he still had grave concerns and had received many phone <br />calls about the TND. He felt this was the new buzzword with DCA. With respect to <br />Objective 18, he contended "will be" should be changed to "encourage". <br />Director Keating explained "encourage" was one of the words that DCA felt was <br />vague and wanted something more definitive. He again asked that they adopt the plan <br />without any changes at this time. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED <br />BY Commissioner Adams, to approve the recommendation with <br />the condition that in July 1999 rotation for the Comprehensive <br />Plan amendments, that the TND be brought back for review <br />with a workshop and discussion. <br />Commissioner Ginn asked how many TND projects Director Keating anticipated in <br />the one-year period, and Director Keating advised that staff is actively working now with a <br />pretty substantial project (500 or 600 acres, partly within and partly without the Urban <br />Service Area). <br />Commissioner Ginn expressed her continued objection to the 10% density bonus <br />within the Urban Service Area calling it inappropriate and unnecessary. <br />Vice Chairman Macht thought her objection was valid, as he understood it, under a <br />recent court decision, once given it is a matter of right. <br />Commissioner Ginn hoped that in the future there would be some flexibility on the <br />internal roads, curved roads are better than a grid. <br />Vice Chairman Macht agreed that something other than geometric layouts is more <br />desirable. He asked if the grid system is mandatory. <br />Director Keating replied it was mandatory in order to get the benefits of the TND. <br />He pointed out that the grid system does not required straight roadways; they can be <br />curvilinear roadways, as long as they intersect and form a type of grid system. It is in <br />opposition to the traditional cul de sac -type of development. <br />Vice Chairman Macht stated that he lived in a grid system area and listed several of <br />the drawbacks, such as noise from cars, refuse being thrown from cars, and dogs leaving <br />mementoes on his property. <br />March 17,1998 <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.