My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/28/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
4/28/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:56:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
600K ,l V �Auc-. o i�m0 a <br />5. Number of Average Weekday Trips Generated: <br />424 <br />5,469 <br />6. Traffic Capacity on This Segment of U.S. 1, at a LOS <br />2,650 peak hour/peak <br />2,650 peak hour4mak <br />"D" <br />seaion/peak direction <br />season/peak direction <br />trips <br />trips <br />7. Total Segment Demand (Existing Volume+ Vested <br />1,272 peak/houv*ak <br />1,272 peak/houvJ=k <br />Volume) on This Segment of U.S. 1 <br />season/peak direction <br />season/peak direction <br />trips <br />trips <br />The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />properties under the existing land use designation is 424. This was determined by multiplying the <br />42 units (most intense use) by ITE's single-family residential factor of 10.1 Average Daily Trip <br />Ends/unit. <br />The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />properties under the proposed land use designation is 5,469. This was determined by multiplying <br />the 70,700 square feet of shopping center use (most intense use) by ITE's shopping center fitted <br />curve factor of 77 Average Daily Trip Ends/1,000 square feet. <br />Since the county's transportation level of service is based on peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />characteristics, the transportation concurrency analysis addresses project traffic occurring in the peak <br />hour and affecting the peak direction of impacted roadways. According to ITE, the proposed use <br />generates more volume in the p.m. peak hour than in the a.m. peak hour. Therefore, the p.m. peak <br />hour was used in the transportation concurrency analysis. The peak direction during the p.m. peak <br />hour on U.S. 1 is southbound <br />Given those conditions, the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be <br />generated by the most intense use of the subject area under the existing land use designation was <br />calculated to be 16. This was determined by multiplying the total number of units allowed (42) <br />under the existing land use designation by IIE's factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit, to determine <br />the total number of trips generated Of these trips, 65% will be inbound and 35% will be outbound. <br />Of the inbound trips, 53% or 15 will be northbound <br />To determine the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject area under the proposed land use designation, the total square <br />footage of shopping center allowed under the proposed amendment (70,700) was multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 7.05 p.m. peak hour trips/1,000 square feet to determine the total number of trips generated <br />(498). Of these trips, 92% or 458 trips are new trips, which are due to the proposed land use <br />designation. From the new trips, 48% (220) will be inbound and 52% (238) will be outbound. Of <br />the outbound trips, 53% or 126 trips will originate from the north of the subject area Therefore, the <br />most intense use of the subject area under the proposed land use designation would generate 111 <br />(126 - 15 = 111) more peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips than the 15 that would be <br />generated by the most intense use of the subject area under the existing land use designation. <br />Using a modified gravity model and a hand assignment, the peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips generated by the proposed use were then assigned to impacted roads on the network. Impacted <br />roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive <br />five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more of the project trips, whichever <br />is less. <br />Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are calculated and updated annually, <br />utilizing the latest and best available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix G <br />methodology as set forth in the Florida Department of Transportation Level of Service Manual. <br />Available capacity is the total capacity less existing and committed (vested) traffic volumes; this is <br />updated daily based upon vesting associated with project approvals. <br />April 28, 1998 <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.