My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/28/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
4/28/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:56:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
600 <br />Chairman Tippin remarked that he has heard so many great things about the wetlands <br />we have created and wanted to know if there is a problem or if the County would really save <br />by bidding this item as recommended. <br />Director Hubbs referred to the old agenda item which recommended that, after a two- <br />year period, the existing contractor would assist the County in developing an RFP. Staff has <br />tried to take it a step further. Since the original contract was never competitively bid, it is <br />probably good public policy to do so now. Obviously, the Board could allow the existing <br />contract to continue; there is nothing wrong with it. Staff is very pleased with the. service <br />being provided by Ecotech Consultants, Inc., however, in reviewing the contract, he believed <br />some money could be saved by going out to bid and injecting competition into the process. <br />Commissioner Gruen voiced agreement with his statement. <br />Commissioner Adams recalled when this contract had first come up and how the <br />Board had discussed the multi-year facet and the costs if the County were to do it in-house. <br />The number one consideration at that time was the County did not have the expertise. She <br />liked the fact that the contractor assumed all liability. She reminded the Commissioners that <br />the County has already had to pay fines to DEP. She felt their assumption of liability was <br />quite valuable. She also recalled an instance relative to animal care where the County went <br />to bid "to get competition", and the County would have been better off leaving animal care <br />as it was. She felt the County was being well -served by Ecotech. <br />Director Hubbs reiterated the intent was to inject some competition into the process <br />which he thought was originally envisioned in 1996. He was pleased with the service and <br />stated that it was planned for the County to eventually take over all responsibilities relating <br />to the wetlands. It is anticipated that the contractor will be the trainer for the County's <br />employees. He advised that the County is planning to do the berm maintenance and a large <br />part of the sampling during this cycle. During the next cycle, the County plans to take over <br />more of the permitting and actual botany and biology -type work. <br />In response to Commissioner Adams, Director Hubbs felt he had the personnel to <br />absorb the work within the department. He thought that once the wetland is established, it <br />will remain fairly self-sustaining because Mother Nature is a very good steward. <br />Commissioner Adams agreed that Mother Nature is a good steward, but when man <br />comes in and tinkers with what Mother Nature has established, all kinds of variables can <br />occur to create problems. <br />April 28, 1998 <br />88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.