Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK ��.I: PAGE 7i <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the project with the aid of the ELMO and <br />pointed out that approval of a PD development is not considered quasi-judicial, but <br />legislative. <br />Commissioner Ginn interjected, with reference to the letter from O'Haire, Quinn & <br />Candler, that she did not intend to vote for staffs recommendation. She questioned whether <br />the applicant wanted to withdraw the proposed plan from consideration. <br />Scott McGuire of Knight, McGuire, representing Windsor, stated that the applicant <br />wished to go ahead with the presentation. <br />Director Boling noted that the total number of units will remain the same. However, <br />the density will decrease a little due to some larger single-family lots. The focus at the <br />Planning & Zoning meeting was on the area closest to the Sanderling development on the <br />ocean. With reference to the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), the 1981 Line is <br />about where the Sanderling houses are, while the 1987 Line is farther west. Staffs <br />recommendation is for 28 units with a Type A buffer at least 30 feet wide. Themain <br />question is how far to set the development back from the CCCL. The CCCL is regulated by <br />the State and staff believes the 1987 Line should be used in order to avoid compromising the <br />ocean view of the Sanderling development. <br />General discussion ensued regarding the CCCL and Community Development <br />Director Bob Keating noted that almost every subdivision platted on the beach has had <br />construction seaward of the 1987 Line. The Department of Environmental Regulation has <br />permitted construction seaward of the 1987 Line on a regular basis. This is a Line of <br />regulation, not of prohibition. <br />The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />regarding this matter. <br />William Glynn, 1802 Barefoot Place, President of the North Beach Civic <br />Association, emphasized that the group is happy with Windsor as a developer and he is not <br />here to criticize them. He believed that a buffer zone is definitely needed as this <br />development will be abutting some very expensive single-family homes. The area in <br />question is a pristine oak hammock and it is a shame to take it down. A large portion of this <br />addition extends over a dune and out onto the beach. There were 18 turtle nests in that area <br />OCTOBER 6, 1998 <br />