My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/6/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
10/6/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:21:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/06/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
last year. He realized this is not an environmental consideration but asked the Board to <br />remember that. He also noted that the highest part of the island is the dune line. If you put <br />a 39 -foot building on a 6 or 9 foot dune, you have created a towering structure. He asked <br />that the Board follow the recommendations of Planning & Zoning. <br />Dr. Howard Smith, 2250 Sanderling Lane, hoped that Indian River County can be <br />kept as beautiful as it is now. He felt that a zoning of RS -3 would be more in keeping with <br />the general development in that area and noted that if Windsor built single-family homes, <br />they could build 27 homes. That development would not have nearly the environmental <br />impact as a multi -family construction. He noted that the only "green" developers are <br />concerned with has pictures of the presidents on it. <br />Tricia Stoddard, 2260 Sanderling Lane, felt the impact of multi -family construction <br />would be devastating on the environment and opposed the development. <br />Paul McDonald, 2345 Sanderling Lane, pointed out that the aerial photograph being <br />used to show the area to be developed was taken approximately 5 years ago. <br />Commissioner Adams noted that this is a critically eroded area. <br />Bob Bruce, 12396 North AlA, felt high density development would not further the <br />image of the north beach area and pleaded with the Board not to let this county develop into <br />another South Florida. <br />Theresa Motley, 12396 North AIA, questioned the need to maximize the usage of <br />the property and asked why Windsor could not be a friendly and considerate neighbor. <br />Scott McGuire, representing Windsor, noted that the property owner has the right to <br />construct 14 multi -family units on the property without any consideration by the Board and <br />with no public hearings. They have tried to increase the compatibility of the project by <br />increasing the setbacks and the buffers, with no increase in density. They are proposing 400 <br />units while 414 would be eligible. They are also setting aside 15% of the native upland <br />vegetation. <br />Commissioner Adams questioned why Windsor is proposing fewer units than not <br />going through the PD process would allow, and Mr. McGuire responded that Windsor is <br />trying to maintain a reasonable development but is not yet sure exactly what will be built <br />OCTOBER 6, 1998 <br />-48- BOOK 107 PAGE 272 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.