Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />action. The Board of County Commissioners should also deny this request because <br />the applicant meets none of the LDR criteria that would exempt the project from <br />using street numbers. These criteria are as follows: <br />(4) Named roads: <br />(a) The requirement of number designations for roads in the <br />unincorporated county shall not apply to named roads established <br />prior to the date of this chapter. <br />(b) All new roads established in the unincorporated county shall be <br />issued a number designation in conformance with the grid pattern as <br />described herein, with the following exceptions: <br />1. Continuations of existing, named roads (roads with name <br />designations only), or <br />2. Roads on the barrier island, or <br />3. Private roads within a planned development or a private <br />subdivision that do not fit into the county's existing grid <br />system of east -west and north -south roads. <br />At the time of development plan application, staff shall apply these <br />criteria in its review of requests for use of road names. Staff <br />determinations shall be final unless appealed pursuant to the <br />provisions of 951.09(2). <br />The applicant is not continuing a named road pattern, and the project is not on the barrier island. <br />The roads within the subdivision can easily fit into the county's overall roadway numbering system, <br />such as was done in the Hammock Lake Estates and Cypress Lake PDs located north of this project. <br />Therefore, the applicant should be required to meet the LDR requirements and use the street <br />numbers, such as 541 Avenue and 531 Avenue, which have been assigned to the project by planning <br />staff. <br />Landscape and Buffering. <br />West Side Village A (Multi -Family) <br />OLD APPLICATION <br />A 50' wide buffer with a 75' setback was proposed along the west side of <br />Village A (multi -family), where Village A abuts Lateral B Canal and 581 <br />Avenue. The buffer was proposed to be a Type "B" with a 6 opaque feature. <br />NEW APPLICATION <br />January 11, 2000 <br />The applicant is now proposing a 25' setback and a Type "C" buffer with a <br />6' opaque feature along the west side of Village "A" (duplexes). Staff <br />recommends that the previous 50' wide Type "B" buffer with a 6' berm and <br />75' building setback be established to provide an effective buffer. <br />km <br />BOOK 11.E PAGE 8�' <br />• <br />