Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Director Boling responded to questions of the Commissioners concerning specifics <br />on the recommendations, buffers, the enclave, and types of natural features which might be <br />present (none) and need to be protected. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Glenn Legwen, whose 5 -acre property is on the comer of 5' Street SW and 58' <br />Avenue, voiced his concerns about the bridge across the canal, potable water and sewer <br />infrastructure, lack of sufficient pocket passive county parks for the public, whether the <br />developer will have to pay for the bridge, and whether there will be a traffic light at the <br />intersection. <br />Chairman Adams pointed out that the matter before them today is the consideration <br />of their conceptual PD and that some of Mr. Legwen's concerns are generally addressed <br />later in the process. <br />Director Boling advised that there are parks included within the project and extensive <br />walking and jogging paths around and through the project. The bridge will be under the <br />aegis of the Public Works Department and will be covered via traffic impact fees, and a <br />Developer's Agreement that will require Board approval. <br />Public Works Director James W. Davis stated that he envisioned a developer's <br />agreement with the developer and the County to cost -share for the road paving and the <br />bridge. <br />Chairman Adams added that there will be a separate developer's agreement for the <br />utilities. <br />Bruce Barkett, 756 Beachland Boulevard, spoke as attorney for the applicant. He <br />reviewed the request and pointed out that his client was here today for conceptual PD plan <br />January 11, 2000 <br />C,R <br />• <br />HOK PAGE f . <br />