My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
01/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:07 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />request that the Board vote "no". He also read a letter which he stated was from Fred Cole <br />which also urged the Board to vote "no" against the rezoning. (CLERK'S NOTE: The letters <br />have been placed in the backup file for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board.) <br />Mr. Haley came forward and presented "several hundred" names on letters in favor <br />of the project for the record. (CLERK'S NOTE: These letters have been placed in the <br />backup file for the meeting also.) In addition, he responded to questions concerning <br />swimming pools which had come up during the hearing. <br />Guy Barber, 1678 Highlands Avenue, wished to present a different twist. His <br />concerns were about taxes, sufficient schools, infrastructure, and that the investor could turn <br />the development into rentals. <br />Mr. Profeta added another concern that the density would be visible from outside the <br />project. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />Commissioner Tippin believed he lived closer than some of the other folks who had <br />signed the petition and yet he had not been approached to sign. He recalled when he first <br />bought in his area how few neighbors there were and since that time some nice folks have <br />moved to the area. Crime has not increased, but the property values have, and that has <br />increased his taxes. He also explained why he favored street names rather than numbers, but <br />understood that numbering was in accordance with the LDRs. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED <br />BY Commissioner Stanbridge, to approve staff's <br />recommendations with conditions set out in the memorandum <br />January 11, 2000 <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.