My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/20/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
6/20/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 8:46:17 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 1:19:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/20/2000
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Public Benefits of the PD Plan: <br />Recently, the planning staff has been asking PD applicants to identify the public benefits that <br />their project will provide in exchange for the county's flexibility with the project's design <br />criteria. In this case. the applicant has indicated that he will be treating run-off from <br />approximately 90 off-site acres. Presently, an FDOT out -fall ditch runs through the site <br />conveying the stormwater run-off from west of US #1 to the Indian River Lagoon. The <br />applicant is proposing to incorporate this run-off into the River Bend stormwater system, <br />providing treatment for run-off which is presently untreated and could be left untreated, if <br />the out -fall ditch were simply rerouted. <br />An additional public benefit staff has identified is the preservation of estuarine wetlands. If <br />the applicant places a conservation easement over the estuarine wetland area as part of the <br />PD plan approval, then the benefit of such preservation would be secured. The conservation <br />easement would need to be established prior to or via the final plat approval and could allow <br />for limited recreation/pedestrian access for project residents. The applicant has not objected <br />to such a conservation easement condition. <br />*PD Plan Analysis: <br />1. Size: 446.5 acres <br />2. Zoning Classifications: <br />Current: RS -1. Residential Single -Family (up to 1 unit/acre) <br />RS -3, Residential Single -Family (up to 3 units/acre) <br />RM -3. Residential Multi -Family (up to 3 units/acre) <br />CG, General Commercial <br />Proposed: PD. Planned Development (up to 1.75 units/acre) <br />Land Use Designations: L-1, Low Density 1 (up to 3 units/acre) <br />C-2, Conservation 2 (up to 1 unit/40 acres) <br />CIL Commercial/Industrial <br />4. Density: 650 units on 446.5 acres = 1.46 units/gross acre <br />Note: Upland density is 650 units on 380.40 acres = 1.71 units/upland acre <br />5. Open Space: Required: 41.40% <br />Provided: 56.40% <br />Note: The open space required percentage is based on the upland zoning standard of 40% <br />and wetland zoning standard of 50%. The 56.40% provided figure does not include any open <br />space credit for any lake area provided. Thus, the provided figure is true green space on <br />individual lots and golf course/common areas. <br />6. Recreation Area: Required: 7.80 acres <br />Provided: 192.18 acres <br />Note: Recreation areas include clubhouse, golf course, walking trails, pool. and tennis <br />facility. <br />June 20, 2000 <br />67 <br />SOCK J t''AGE i �+ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.