Laserfiche WebLink
7/24/2015 <br /> Stakeholder Comments Received (cont.) <br /> SJRWMD <br /> SJRWMD agrees that County should maximize use of existing WTPs <br /> while concurrently developing an alternative for long term needs. <br /> Requested letter from BOCC requesting that the well abandonment <br /> program be reinstated with funding from SJRWMD (subsequently sent <br /> to SJRWMD on March 6, 2015); staff would support this effort <br /> SJRWMD not necessarily opposed to use of Boulder Zone as a supply <br /> source, but would prefer use of surface water <br /> Stated that no RFQ is currently in process for reconnection of the <br /> SFWMD canals to the SJRWMD (as previously stated) <br /> Smith <br /> Stakeholder Comments Received (cont.) <br /> SJRWMD (cont.) <br /> Staff unaware of pending regulatory changes that will allow inter- <br /> basin transfers <br /> Demand and populations presented in draft differ slightly from <br /> SJRWMD Water Supply Plan; staff now understands the discrepancy <br /> Backup/dual sources are permittable under current regulations <br /> (provisions for drought conditions); redundant allocations are not. <br /> CDM Smith will correct these statements throughout analysis. <br /> Staff offered clarifications on current position of statements made in <br /> 2007 AWSMP. <br /> Smith <br /> iaG•A• 15 <br />