My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2020 4:53:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:30:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
10/23/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2547
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In reviewing the best choice, it was necessary to understand that the Finance Department needs <br />to have access to the records as frequently as daily. Both Archives Management and Storage <br />Solutions offer delivery of those needed records, but the cost is not desirable especially from <br />Palm City. By driving to Storage Solutions, the only charge that is levied would be a one -dollar <br />retrieval fee. Archives Management in Palm city is clearly too far to drive. While U -Store -It is <br />located in Indian River County, its remote location makes it inconvenient for staff to retrieve a <br />document. <br />The cost for the storage is based on cubic foot displacement and the fee charged by Storage <br />Solutions is $.47 per cubic foot. Based on an estimate of files that might have to be stored, the <br />estimated monthly charlue would be $603.01 monthly. <br />The charge for the same storage by Archives Management is S.25 per cubic foot, which is less <br />expensive, but the distance negates the savings and the delivery costs are also high. U -Store -It <br />provides storage in individual 100 square foot units that are air-conditioned and under scrutiny of <br />closed circuit TV cameras. Each of those units can be rented for S75 per month. It is estimated <br />that at least 6 units would be necessary. There is no retrieval service offered and the time and <br />distance to send an employee to obtain a record is not cost effective. <br />Overall, this type of storage is likely to continue until such time as more comprehensive solution <br />to record storage is determined. That could be resolved with either a new facility providing for <br />storage or space in existing county facilities becoming available. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />In light of the sensitivity of these particular financial records and the need for Finance personnel <br />to have quick reasonable access to these documents, Storage Solutions offers the best value for <br />the storage currently needed. Staff recommends that the Board waive the normal bidding <br />procedure and authorize the use of Storage solutions for reasons stated above and authorize the <br />Chairman to execute a rental agreement with Storage Solutions subject to the County Attorney's <br />approval of the agreement documents. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Stanbridge, the <br />Board unanimously waived the normal bidding <br />procedure and authorized the use of Storage <br />Solutions and authorized the Chairman to execute <br />a rental agreement with Storage Solutions subject <br />to the County Attorney's approval of the <br />agreement documents; as recommended by staff. <br />OCTOBER 23, 2001 <br />AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE <br />OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />-100- <br />`� nr ' <br />�; � t; J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.