1/9/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Director Boling responded to Commissioners ' questions concerning stormwater management , size of buildings , setbacks , and areas of green space . He offered comparisons of what could be built in multi - family zoning districts with an RM - 6 site plan versus what is permitted under a PD . In addition , he specified that extra buffering would be required with the PD . He pointed out that any redevelopment of this site would probably be of benefit whether it were a PD or a site plan project . Community Development Director Robert M . Keating commented that other benefits . such as the replacement of the septic tanks by public sewer system and elimination of setback non - conformities and mobile homes , would also result . Commissioner Adams inquired whether the developer intends to build rental or condominium units . Director Boling advised that the developer would have to address that question , since the application does not cover that . He did mention that the developer ' s current plan could change over the life of the project . Chairman Ginn questioned the wisdom of approving structures on stilts . The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter . Ira Hatch . a local attorney representing homeowners Durrance and the River Boat Club Subdivisions , all single- family homes , presented for the record a copy of a petition signed by 42 River Boat Club homeowners requesting the Board reject the application , reverse the ruling of the Planning and Zoning Commission , and maintain the RM- 6 zoning for the subject property . ( The copy of the petition has been placed on file with the backup for the meeting in the office of the Clerk to the Board . ) His clients favored redevelopment of the property but had concerns that standing water under the stilt homes would attract January 9 , 2001 1i €� 6 _ 6