Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />After Director Keating responded to questions concerning actual development density <br />in the area, Commissioner Macht stated that he could not support RVI -8 in spite of the <br />zoning specified by the Comprehensive Plan and believed the property should be rezoned <br />to RM -6. <br />Commissioner Ginn agreed that it should be RM -6 particularly if it should be <br />developed in subsidized housing which would permit a density bonus. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />W. F. "Bill" McCain, W. F. McCain and Associates, 2066 14th Avenue, Vero <br />Beach, representing the applicant, Gary Purdy, advised that the neighbors generally <br />supported this proposal. He distributed a handout to the Commissioners which included a <br />site plan and letters in support from two neighbors who could not attend. (A copy of the <br />handout has been placed on file with the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.) He <br />was aware of some concerns of the neighbors and gave assurances concerning density, <br />buffers, and roadways issues. He described the 4 contiguous parcels in detail and indicated <br />a willingness on behalf of his client to accept RM -6 on Parcel 1 but he explained the <br />configuration of the whole site pointing out why Mr. Purdy wanted RM -8 on Parcels 2, 3, <br />and 4. He specified that Mr. Purdy wished to develop 32 units rather than 28 units on <br />Parcels 2, 3, and 4. He believed that a project being planned by the Department of <br />Transportation will take care of neighbors' concerns about safety factors relative to ingress <br />and egress on SR 60. He understood those FDO f construction plans will soon be coming <br />to fruition. <br />Mr. McCain responded to questions of Commissioners Ginn and Adams to clarify <br />the sizes and configuration of the 4 parcels, the driveway, and renovations to Mr. Purdy's <br />April 23, 2002 <br />51 <br />Di'' ' '14 27 <br />