Laserfiche WebLink
private residence on Parcel 1. <br />Gary Purdy, 7775 20`'' Street, advised that the property had been in his family since <br />the 1960's and he planned on staying there, has recently done extensive remodeling and <br />added a pool. He wanted the development of the property compatible with his home and the <br />neighborhood. He described how his development will be gated. He has spoken with <br />neighbors and has tried to address their concerns. Using one of the graphics, he pointed out <br />the homes of neighbors who have signed letters supporting the project. <br />Commissioner Adams was concerned about what would happen if Mr. Purdy sold the <br />property. If the Board were to rezone the property RM -8, there would be no guarantee that <br />the property would be developed as Mr. Purdy has planned. <br />Mr. McCain explained that Mr. Purdy plans to have 32 units on the site but RM -6 <br />would allow only 28 units; that RM -8 would actually allow 48 units on the total of six acres. <br />A discussion was held on maximum density after which Commissioner Adams <br />indicated her preference to support RM -6. <br />Bob Hennessey, 1933 Tamara Trail, advised that he was representing his condo <br />association which is located near the proposed rezoning. He specified they had no objection <br />to RM -6. He then advised that the association's petition for a sewer line was just submitted <br />to Utilities Department Assessment Projects Manager Dan Chastain and they want the ability <br />to connect if there is going to be one nearby. <br />Leonard Hatala, 5865 34th Street, owns two units in Tamara Gardens and property <br />on SR 60. He favored RM -6 but not RM -8. <br />Homer Gindlesperger, 1935 79`'' Avenue, was concerned that 79`x' Avenue, which <br />he can now use, will no longer provide direct access to SR 60. He saw no problem with the <br />Board approving RM -6. <br />April 23, 2002 <br />52 <br />B( <br />Th <br />�� t28 <br />