Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br /> s <br /> } ..>n: k43 i" 2 ' a . . o {Xµk:u`�. .. {•., y, ,uif` -.:_ i <br /> fi'3 <br /> ..... , . ..... Y . > 3.. . <br /> > K `FG� <br /> Policy 3 .2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it <br /> is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br /> Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, conditional concurrency review is required . <br /> Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a <br /> proposed project. Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects , county <br /> regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject <br /> property based upon the requested land use designation . For residential Comprehensive Plan <br /> amendment requests , the most intense use (according to the County ' s LDRs ) is the maximum <br /> number of units that could be built on the site , given the size of the property and the maximum <br /> density under the proposed land use designation . The site information used for the concurrency <br /> analysis is as follows : <br /> 1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : ±892 acres <br /> 2 . Existing Land Use Designation : AG- 1 , Agricultural- 1 (up to 1 unit/5 acres) <br /> 3 . Proposed Land Use Designation : T, Transitional Residential ( up to 3 units/acre) <br /> Ile I <br /> 4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br /> Under Current Land Use Designation : 178 Single-Family Units <br /> 5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br /> Under Proposed Land Use Designation : 2,676 Single-Family Units <br /> Transportation <br /> As part of the concurrency review process , staff analyzes the number of peak hour/peak season/peak <br /> direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the <br /> proposed land use designation, and assigns those trips to impacted roads. Impacted roads are defined <br /> in section 910. 09(4) (b)3 of the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5 % ) <br /> or more of the project traffic or fifty (50 ) or more project trips , whichever is less . 4 <br /> According to staff' s analysis , the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be <br /> lowered by the traffic generated by development of 2 . 676 single - family units on the subject <br /> properties . Attachment 2 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency <br /> analysis . <br /> Water <br /> With the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, the subject property could accommodate 2 , 676 <br /> single - family residential units , resulting in water consumption at a rate of 2 ,676 Equivalent <br /> Residential Units (ERU) , or 669,000 gallons/day . This is based upon a level of service of 250 <br /> gallons/ERU/day. Development on the subject property would be served by the South County <br /> Reverse Osmosis Plant, which currently has a remaining capacity of more than 4,500,000 gallons/day <br /> and can accommodate the additional demand generated by the proposed Comprehensive Plan <br /> amendment. <br /> Although plant capacity is sufficient, county utilities staff has indicated that the long- term capacity <br /> of the distribution system ( i .e . , pumping capacity ) could be impacted by the proposed amendment . <br /> Staff will need to closely monitor and plan for growth in this area . <br /> JUNE 5 , 2001 , 1t r` <br /> - 90 - <br /> R <br /> `• TRK x F` �i v^sn xiir. itfl xf :k - wrx n" "S7VF�7=l ell-t777 Ile— <br /> E �. .;r <br /> iIF <br /> x . { xIle <br /> It ell <br /> r o- t lelee <br /> Ile, <br /> Ile <br /> i lI ell, <br /> ee, 4 i <br /> T S re . "Pe x <br /> Ile �, d" Y n u ,gyp t ,fl :"' 'R ry r ll <br /> " i s ; y + r i <br /> u' . a,. u . >. . . , +au „: . . _ -u , . n... .. . , . _ . v , n< , . r« cr;. _ <br /> r .r , <br />