My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/23/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
9/23/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2021 3:00:16 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:53:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2573
Book and Page
125, 900-959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />spoken with them about this application but about growth issues in general. <br />Mr. Kerslake advised several of Bent Pine residents offered their support and he <br />presented 8 letters indicating that support. (Placed on file with the backup in the Office of <br />the Clerk to the Board.) <br />Gordon Mann, a resident of Bent Pine for 15 years, current President of the <br />Condominium Association, supported the application. He stated that the general consensus <br />is that this is the best looking application and the best property around us. It should enhance <br />the Bent Pine area because they are talking about a gated -community; they have a lot of <br />appeal; and he thought they were quite sincere. The covenant (deed restriction) Mr. Kerslake <br />offered was the "closer" because it assured them that development of the property would <br />be bound by it and limited to 3.5 units per acre. He wanted the applicant to have the <br />opportunity to build a community there. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to approve staff's <br />recommendations. <br />Under discussion, both Commissioner Lowther and Commissioner Adams supported <br />the motion because this complies with what is in the Comp Plan. Commissioner Lowther <br />believed Mr. Gross' comments were right on target. <br />Commissioner Adams thought the Commissioners are now having "cold feet" but <br />she felt the Comp Plan dust needs to be tweaked. The applicant's promise to develop only <br />3.5 units/per acre was a good thing. She would love to see it as a PD. <br />September 23, 2003 <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.