My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/13/2011 (5)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
12/13/2011 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 9:30:10 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:10:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/13/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4051
Book and Page
141, 740-776
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Paladin concluded his presentation by expressing that he was not planning to build a <br /> big box, but rather a building that is architecturally appealing . He wanted to be a teammate to <br /> the neighboring community, and felt the ALF/ACLF would be less intensive than building a drug <br /> store , restaurant, or movie theatre on the site . He believed the project would greatly benefit the <br /> community and its residents , and requested the Board approve the conceptual site plan and <br /> special exception use . <br /> In response to Chairman Wheeler, Mr. Paladin specified that the facility would target <br /> individuals who can live alone, but still need assistance . <br /> A brief discussion ensued regarding density and parking capacity for the condominiums <br /> at Reflections on the River. <br /> There being no other speakers , the Chairman closed the Public Hearing . <br /> Vice Chairman O ' Bryan did not believe the delivery traffic, or the three- story building <br /> would be a concern; however, he felt the proposed 4046ot distance between existing Building 11 <br /> (in Reflections on the River) and the proposed three-story facility would have an adverse effect <br /> on the individuals in the one - story building . He supported the special exception application with <br /> the condition that there is an increased buffer (possibly 75 ' ) between Building 11 and the <br /> proposed facility . <br /> Commissioner Davis felt there also needed to be appropriate aesthetics between the two <br /> buildings . <br /> Commissioner Flescher felt that many of the aforementioned concerns would be a matter <br /> of site-based management . <br /> Commissioner Solari provided reasons why he would normally support this request ; <br /> however, he believed he was charged to find out if this was compatible with the surrounding land <br /> 141 PG 764 <br /> December 13 , 2011 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.