My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/04/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:40:23 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:43:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/04/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
40
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Solari mentioned that the City charges its customers a 10% franchise fee <br />in addition to the County's surcharge. <br />A brief discussion followed, with input from County Administrator Baird, about the <br />franchise fees that the County is allowed to impose. <br />(Clerk's Note: The 6% equalization fee is not a franchise fee). <br />Commissioners Davis, Flescher, Solari and Zorc voiced support for the elimination of <br />the 6% surcharge on City residents. They felt the charge was no longer defensible and that it <br />poses an additional burden on the residents who must also pay the City's 10% franchise fee. <br />Chairman O'Bryan advocated maintaining the surcharge, in order to avoid creating a <br />situation where some customers pay less than others for water. He stressed that the City's fee is <br />a matter between the City and its customers, and that a lot of money is spent out of the General <br />Fund for Sebastian residents. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher for discussion, to <br />approve Resolution 2014-020, eliminating the rate <br />equalization charge of 6% for non -unincorporated area <br />customers established per Resolution 95-16; and <br />establishing an effective date for the elimination of the <br />rate equalization charge. <br />Further debate ensued among the Commissioners on whether the equalization fee was <br />still warranted and fair. <br />Chairman O'Bryan reiterated his support for maintaining the charge. <br />March 4, 2014 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.