Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule . . . , . . . . . . . 11 . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . X -23 <br /> FutureDemand Analysis . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01 , 111 , 11 , . . . . 1 , . . . M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . X -23 <br /> EstimatedRevenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . 01 . 1 . . . . . . . . . X -24 <br /> Tables <br /> Table 1 - 1 Impact Fee Service Area Considerations by Program Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I -9 <br /> Table 1 -2 Current and Recommended Standards by Impact Fee <br /> ProgramArea . . 4 . . . . . . . I I . I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 " " a 0 0 0 ' * * q * * 0 0 * * 0 0 0 0 . . . 1 <br /> I - 12 <br /> Table I - 3 Comparison of Fees by Impact Fee Program A . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . 1 - 13 <br /> Table 1 -4 Historical and Projected Capital Facility Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " I ' ll 1 - 14 <br /> Table II - 1 IRC Population Estimates and Projections . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 . . . . . . . . . . II -2 <br /> Table II -2 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . I . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II <br />- 3 <br /> Table II -3 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit Excluding <br /> IndianRiver Shores . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . M . . . * . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . 11 . 11 . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . . . II -3 <br /> Table II -4 Unincorporated County Area Residents per Housing Unit . . . . . , . . . I . . . . . I1 -4 <br /> Table II - 5 Nationwide Residents per Housing Unit — Single Family . . . " I . . . . . . . . . . . II -4 <br /> Table II - 6 Countywide Residents per Housing Unit . . . . . . . 1 . 111 . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - <br />5 <br /> Table II - 7 Countywide Excluding Indian River Shores — Residents <br /> perHousing Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 5 <br /> Table II - 8 Unincorporated County Area — Residents per Housing Unit. . , . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 6 <br /> Table II -9 24-Hour/ 7 -Day General Functional Population Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . 1I -9 <br /> Table II - 10 11 -Hour/5 -Day General Functional Population Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 10 <br /> Table 11 - 11 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2004 <br /> (24 -Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111 . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . II - 11 <br /> Table 11 - 12 Countywide Excluding Indian River Shores Functional <br /> Population - Year 2004 (24 -Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . 4 . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 12 <br /> Table II - 13 Unincorporated County Area Functional Population — <br /> Year 2004 (24-Hour Analysis ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . 11 - 13 <br /> Table II - 14 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2004 <br /> ( 11 -Hour Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 14 <br /> Table II - 15 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — <br /> Correctional Facilities (Countywide) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . II - 15 <br /> Table II - 16 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — <br /> PublicBuildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . 1 <br />. 11 . . . . . . . . . . II - 16 <br /> Table I1 - 17 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — <br /> FIRE/EM S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> . . . . . . . . " I . . . . . . . . . . 1I - 16 <br /> Table 11 - 18 Functional Residents for Residential Land Uses — <br /> LawEnforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . " I ' ll " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 . 1 . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . I . , . . . . . . <br /> II - 17 <br /> Table II - 19 Assumptions for Nonresidential Land Uses and Functional <br /> Population Coefficients for Impact Fee Schedule - <br /> PublicBuildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . 11 - 18 <br /> Table 11 -20 Assumptions for Nonresidential Land Uses and Functional <br /> Population Coefficients for Impact Fee Schedule — <br /> Correctional Facilities , Fire/EMS , and Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . II - 19 <br /> Table III - 1 Land & Buildings Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />. . . . . . . . . . III -2 <br /> Tindale -Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 iv Impact Fee Study <br />