My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
repositioned as dictated by the deposition pattern , can effectively distribute the coarse sediment over the basin <br /> floor . A flow-splitter or a spoon to break the jet ' s momentum will also help the single inlet distribute the <br /> slurry . Regardless of the inlet design or operation , maintenance of optimal basin performance will require <br /> regrading the dewatered sediment to reestablish the initial uniform slope of about 0 . 2 % ( Section 2 .2 . 2) from <br /> inlet to weir before each successive placement operation . <br /> Preliminary analysis of the settling characteristics of the dredged material to be placed in the IR- 14 <br /> containment basin ( Section 2 . 3 . 3 ) indicates that the available distance between inlet and weirs will afford <br /> adequate solids retention . Moving the inlet for more even material distribution must not significantly reduce <br /> this separation distance without additional precautions . To ensure continued compliance with water quality <br /> standards , these additional precautions may include increasing the ponding depth or installing turbidity <br /> screens surrounding the weirs . <br /> 2. 3 . 2 Weirs <br /> The IR- 14 facility will use weirs to control the release of the clarified surface layer of the water <br /> ponded within the containment basin . Adjustment of weir height controls ponding depth within the <br /> containment basin which in turn controls basin retention time . Weir height and ponding depth are discussed <br /> in more detail in the next section . However, several additional aspects of weir design affect the flow of water <br /> inside the basin and thereby strongly influence the efficiency of solids retention and the quality of effluent <br /> released from the site . These include weir crest width , weir crest length , weir type, and the location of the <br /> weir within the containment basin . Each of these design aspects and its effect on basin efficiency is discussed <br /> in the following paragraphs. <br /> The first two weir design parameters , -weir crest width and weir crest length , affect weir <br /> performance by determining its withdrawal depth. The withdrawal depth is the depth at which gravity forces <br /> on suspended sediment particles exceed the inertial forces associated with flow over the weir. It therefore <br /> represents the depth of the surface layer of ponded water that is drawn over the weir crest and released from <br /> the containment basin . Maintaining the withdrawal depth less than the ponding depth reduces the possibility <br /> of resuspending sediment which has settled out of the upper water column . Moreover, since the <br /> concentration of suspended sediment increases with depth, minimizing the depth of the withdrawal layer <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.