Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br /> . . e- . _ _ . <br /> - A . ! ' . <br /> cent gaa tax by 2011. <br /> o Prioritization of Needs Plan Improvements <br /> To rank the Needs Plan roadway improvements, the MPO developed project prioritization <br /> criteria. These criteria provided the basis for determining which roadway projects would be <br /> included in the 2030 2040 Cost Feasible Plan. <br /> The road widening projects that are identified in the LRTP 2030 2040 Cost Feasible Plan are <br /> shown in Table 4.9.11_8. As shown in Table 4 9.4-4_8, the total cost of the Cost Feasible Plan <br /> improvements is $581.3616.87 million. The following observations can be made about the final <br /> 2030 2040 roadway network: <br /> • Major state road improvements include 195 (from N. County Line to S. County Line), <br /> . ' :! • . . . .. • •• • . :; Mc), and US 1 (from S. County Line to 4th eet @ <br /> •. - • • •- ! US-i from CR510 to 53rd Street <br /> and the new Oslo Road interchange with 1-95. <br /> Y. . •- -• - - ., '. ' : • - - ' ., : -- ' :•- - th eett) a -lanes <br /> Beach. <br /> • Major road improvements in the southern and central portion of the county include Oslo <br /> Road (from I-95 to Old Dixie Hwy66th Avenue) to four lanes, the I-95/Oslo Road <br /> interchange, east/west roads (8th-12th Street, 16th Street, 26th Street, 53rd Street, Aviation <br /> Blvd), and north/south roads (43rd Avenue, 58th Avenue, 66th Avenue). <br /> • Major road improvements in the northern portion of the county include CR 512 (from I- <br /> 95 to Roseland Road)to four-six lanes, CR 510 (from CR512 to US 1)to four lanes, <br /> 510 @ 66th • . : :. . . , - - - „ ,. --82nd Avenue from 26th Street to <br /> CR510, and the extension of Laconia St to CR 510. <br /> An analysis of the system-wide impacts of the adopted Cost Feasible Plan appears in Table 4.9.2. <br /> These statistics represent system-wide comparisons, and include volume/capacity ratios, and <br /> total accidents;, <br /> Community Development Department Indian River County 92 <br /> APPENDIX A—Transportation Amendments <br />